• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Courtroom5

Be Your Own Lawyer

  • How It Works
  • Legal Tips
    • Access To Justice
    • Affirmative Defenses
    • Discovery
    • Dismissal
    • Legal Research
    • Litigation Strategy
    • Summary Judgment
  • Sign Up
  • Sign In

February 25, 2016 By Sonja Ebron 48 Comments

Vincent Morris Answers 3 Questions On Justice

Vincent Morris, co-founder of Arkansas’ innovative legal startup Open Access Law Firm, is one of the Lawyers We Love™. Open Access is one of a new breed of law firms trying to bridge the gap between full legal representation (with those hefty retainers) and the limited pocketbooks of the average American. What’s different about Vincent’s effort is the focus on empowering clients by putting legal technology in their hands.

Vincent Morris A self-taught web programmer, Vincent spent a decade building “justice tech” for the Arkansas Legal Services Partnership, a collaboration between the state’s two free legal aid programs. He and a partner started their new venture to take that experience directly to the people. His background in legal aid and passion for fairness gave Vincent some full-throated responses to our questions on justice.

#1: What does justice mean?

Vincent Morris: It always surprises me how hard it is to define “justice.” The idea of what is right, wrong and beneficial for a society can differ dramatically between people. So the concept of justice must begin with a “reasonable agreement” among members of a community about what they collectively believe to be right and wrong. From that (often dynamic) common ground, the concept of justice becomes the foundation of a society by codifying these agreed upon rights and wrongs into law. These laws should then provide a consistent understanding of expectations and protections for all people.

Justice is achieved when these agreements (the law, with both its benefits and burdens) are applied in an equal and unbiased way to everyone under the law. Equality, therefore, is a foundational component of justice and the law is a remarkable attempt to make life fair for everyone. This is so important because we all know that life is not fair. Life does not give equal opportunities to all, but true justice demands that the law treat all people as equals and provide equal rights for all.

#2: What is access to justice?

Vincent Morris: Access to justice means the right to have meaningful participation in the legal process regardless of income or privilege. In our current structure, however, it can be very difficult for someone that cannot afford an attorney to navigate the maze of our court system. There is an access-to-justice crisis in the American criminal and civil justice system. In fact, The Rule of Law Index, released by the independent World Justice Project, found that in some categories the U.S. even ranks below some developing nations, such as Botswana and Georgia in our accessibility to justice.

My work with legal aid for over twelve years has been focused on not only increasing pro bono assistance, but also self-help resources that have been used by tens of thousands of Arkansans that cannot afford attorney assistance.

#3: What is the impact on society when everyone has access to justice?

Vincent Morris: The courthouse plays a unique role in our system of democracy because it is the forum where the citizens of our nation can present their grievances against individuals, corporate entities and the government. The courthouse serves as the physical interface for the execution of laws where a party against whom an action is brought — either civil or criminal — typically cannot opt out of the action without potentially serious financial or personal consequences or loss of liberty. If one cannot afford an attorney and one cannot opt out of the system, then self-representation is the only option left.

The first seventeen words of our Constitution — “We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice . . .” — did not come with the caveat “for those who can afford it.” Indeed, the denial of meaningful access to justice to a significant segment of our society — those who cannot afford attorneys — is a failure of our profession and of our system of democracy. The impact on society when everyone has access to justice will be nothing less than the fulfillment of the promise of our constitution and equality for all.

—————————————

That’s a mighty word, and not too much to ask in a just society. This is the kind of advocacy we need and expect from the legal profession.

Here’s an ABA profile of Vincent from 2012:

Vincent has been lauded by the ABA (2012 Legal Rebel award) and the National Legal Aid & Defender Association (2014 Equal Justice award), for good and obvious reasons.  You can reach Vincent at the Open Access Law Firm or on Twitter @VincentMorris3.

Keep walking the talk, Vincent!

More Like This:

  • If You're A Pro Se Plaintiff, This Manual Is For YouIf You're A Pro Se Plaintiff, This Manual Is For You
  • 31 Affirmative Defenses And How To Assert Them31 Affirmative Defenses And How To Assert Them
  • #BlackLivesMatter = #DefundThePolice#BlackLivesMatter = #DefundThePolice
  • Best Blog Posts For Pro Se Litigants — The 2019 EditionBest Blog Posts For Pro Se Litigants — The 2019 Edition
  • Did You Come To Appease Or To Conquer? The 5 Types Of Pro Se LitigantsDid You Come To Appease Or To Conquer? The 5 Types…
  • Test Your Readiness For CourtTest Your Readiness For Court
  • The Skills You Need To Be Effective In CourtThe Skills You Need To Be Effective In Court
  • 11 Things To Consider When You Need To Sue11 Things To Consider When You Need To Sue

Tagged With: Arkansas, Lawyers We Love, legal aid, Vincent Morris

About Sonja Ebron

Sonja Ebron is a co-founder at Courtroom5. She enjoys being underestimated in court and lives to catch a lawyer in a procedural error.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. mabel sie says

    May 14, 2017 at 1:19 pm

    am scheduled for a case management conference. already have 2(!) judgments for fraud. Still, the defendant (California real estate commissioner and staff) denying my claim for recovery. Have complied with the Cal B&P codes (10471 et seq). Am 86 and convinced my claim is well founded, hence the 2 fraud judgment. CalBRE = dragging on my case. What else can I do?

    Reply
    • Sonja Ebron says

      May 15, 2017 at 6:34 pm

      Hi, Mabel. Sorry to hear your case is dragging on, but happy to hear about your wins.

      Civil litigation is such a slow a frustrating process, especially when you’re clear about the merits of your case. Really the best thing to do is to be aggressive and go through the motions (no pun intended).

      Sounds like you’ve got an answer to your complaint. Have you sent and received the discovery you need to prove your case at trial? Have you moved to admit or stop the admission of certain evidence at trial?

      Take a free trial of our service if you think we can help. Keep moving forward, and good luck.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Get Our Free 5-Day Course to Your Inbox

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

We hate spam too. We'll never share your email.

Popular Articles

  • 31 affirmative defenses 31 Affirmative Defenses And How To Assert Them
  • biggest mistakes pro se litigants make 6 Of The Biggest Mistakes Pro Se Litigants Make
  • How to Write a Motion How To Write A Motion--A Guide And Sample Motions For Pro Se Litigants

Popular Tags

access to justice affirmative defenses answer appeal bias Brian Vukadinovich case analysis Case Manager civil legal aid complaint constitution court costs court reporter Courtroom5 criminal discovery elements of a claim eviction evidence hearing how to win in court I Am Not A Lawyer judicial bias jurisdiction Lawyers We Love legal analysis legal argument Legal Bits legal research litigation litigation strategy motion for summary judgment motion to dismiss podcast pro se litigants pro se litigation Richard Zorza rules of civil procedure self-representation self represented litigant settlement Sonja Ebron summary judgment trial unbundled legal services
Follow @Courtroom5Legal
Courtroom5
Courtroom5 @Courtroom5Legal
3 days ago
Thanks to @WRAL for naming Courtroom5 a finalist in this year’s Voters Choice Award for most innovative local startup. #WRALVCAs https://t.co/Vde2rnxfQQ
View on Twitter
0
0
Courtroom5
Courtroom5 @Courtroom5Legal
4 days ago
Yes, still true. #accesstojustice https://t.co/D0PgmjNwDr
View on Twitter
Open Hands Legal Svc @openhandslegal
https://t.co/X4xw9pYT1w
1
2
Courtroom5
Courtroom5 @Courtroom5Legal
3 weeks ago
New at Courtroom5–> What Legal Expenses Can Pro Se Litigants Recover? #accesstojustice https://t.co/oVh5AoGozG https://t.co/HKkjB2OnT4
View on Twitter
0
0
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Courtroom5 | A Techstars Company · My Account
No legal advice offered · No substitute for a lawyer

We use cookies to ensure the best experience on our website. If you continue to browse Courtroom5, we assume this is okay for you.OK