• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Courtroom5

Be Your Own Lawyer

  • How It Works
  • Legal Tips
    • Access To Justice
    • Affirmative Defenses
    • Discovery
    • Dismissal
    • Legal Research
    • Litigation Strategy
    • Summary Judgment
  • Sign Up
  • Sign In

October 27, 2018 By Sonja Ebron 2 Comments

Letting Your Opposing Counsel Know It’s The Other Way

You remember that iconic scene from The Wire where Marlo Stanfield, the drug boss, showed the store rent-a-cop “it’s the other way.” A Courtroom5 member recently shared her experience of teaching that lesson to an arrogant opposing lawyer.

talking to opposing counselIn the scene, Marlo browses the aisles of a convenience store, watching the security guard watch him. He’s feeling himself and wants to knock 5-0 off his roost, a power play to show the guard who’s really in charge. Marlo pays for his bottled water but slips a couple unpaid lollipops into his pocket while looking the guard dead in the face.

Marlo is a known quantity, and the guard doesn’t want trouble. But he has a job. So he follows Marlo outside to challenge the theft. Marlo explains to him, “You want it to be one way. But it’s the other way.”

Lawyers opposing Courtroom5 members sometimes discover it’s the other way through painful experience. The “one way” they know, where pro se litigants are quickly strong-armed into defeat, is not the way at Courtroom5. Here, it’s the other way, where people have the tools to handle bullies.

Our member Patricia filed a personal injury claim a few months ago. The defendant’s law firm entered an appearance in the case and promptly answered her complaint. Then they filed a motion to dismiss her claim and scheduled the hearing without consulting Patricia. When Patricia asked to reschedule because she had a conflict, a paralegal at the law firm told her they’d scheduled the hearing for the convenience of the lawyers, and tough luck. Patricia was told the hearing would go on as scheduled whether she attended or not.

In Patricia’s state and many others, lawyers have access to court calendars, but pro se litigants do not. That meant Patricia couldn’t cancel or reschedule the hearing on her own. She realized she would never be able to schedule hearings without consulting the defendant, as they had done to her. It was patently unfair.

But rather than cry in her milk, Patricia decided she wouldn’t be lawyer-handled that way. If the defendant refused to play fair, she’d get a judge to make them play fair.

There were two ways to go about it. The straightforward way was to file a motion to strike the notice of hearing on grounds the defendant hadn’t consulted her before setting it on the judge’s calendar, and that she had a conflict on that date. Patricia calculated that the judge would shrug his shoulders and refuse to act. So instead, she went over the top, demanding access to the court’s electronic calendar system, which the paralegal had used to schedule the hearing.

Patricia argued she’d been denied equal access to the courts.

There’s a statute in most states, and a constitutional provision in others, mandating equal access to the courts. It’s the reason for language translators, reasonable accommodations for the disabled, indigent fee waivers, and self-help forms and tools. But when a lawyer can schedule a hearing and an unrepresented party cannot, there’s clearly still work to do in providing equal access to the courts.

In Patricia’s case, a state bar number was required to access the court’s calendaring system. She didn’t have one.

So Patricia filed a motion demanding access to the calendar, with an alternative motion (something the court could grant instead to make things better) to strike the hearing and order the defendant not to use the electronic calendar for the remainder of the case. Tricky, yeah. A fundamental sales principle is to give the customer an expensive alternative to your main product. It makes what you want to sell look like a bargain. Patricia gave the judge a choice between letting all pro se litigants access the calendar or stopping a single lawyer from abusing his access.

It was a simple choice, but Patricia went even further. Another sales principle is to create a sense of urgency. Patricia filed an emergency motion for access to the calendar because there wouldn’t be time before the scheduled hearing to hear her motion to strike that hearing. That meant the judge would grant or deny her motion without hearing from the defendant’s lawyers.

It was over in less than a day. A duty judge granted Patricia’s alternative motion, striking the hearing and requiring all future hearings be jointly scheduled. The defendant’s lawyer was barred from using the court’s calendaring system to schedule a hearing without Patricia’s permission. Instead, all hearings would be scheduled through a judicial assistant assigned to the case, to whom the parties had equal access.

A level playing field was all Patricia wanted. As a pro se litigant, she’d had to go around the block to get it, but she got it. The lawyer who’d wanted it to be one way was made to understand it was the other way.

So many times in life we are brought to that understanding. There’s a bigger lesson here:

We want to believe that our loved ones will live forever and then someone dies. We want to believe our relationships will last forever and then your lover leaves. We want to believe that our children will be ‘productive’ and then they are incarcerated. We want to believe we have job security and then we are fired. We want to believe we will remain healthy and then we are stricken with illness. With each incident we feel pain. And the reason we feel this pain is because we want it to be one way, but it’s the other way.

The law firm representing Patricia’s opponent will hopefully do things differently now. They’ll need a more legitimate case strategy, because Patricia did not come for play play.

More Like This:

  • Test Your Readiness For CourtTest Your Readiness For Court
  • If You're A Pro Se Plaintiff, This Manual Is For YouIf You're A Pro Se Plaintiff, This Manual Is For You
  • Best Blog Posts For Pro Se Litigants — The 2019 EditionBest Blog Posts For Pro Se Litigants — The 2019 Edition
  • Did You Come To Appease Or To Conquer? The 5 Types Of Pro Se LitigantsDid You Come To Appease Or To Conquer? The 5 Types…
  • 31 Affirmative Defenses And How To Assert Them31 Affirmative Defenses And How To Assert Them
  • #BlackLivesMatter = #DefundThePolice#BlackLivesMatter = #DefundThePolice
  • How To Analyze A Civil Case And Craft A Litigation Strategy, Part 2How To Analyze A Civil Case And Craft A Litigation…
  • 11 Things To Consider When You Need To Sue11 Things To Consider When You Need To Sue

Tagged With: access to justice, equal access, Marlo Stanfield, The Wire

About Sonja Ebron

Sonja Ebron is a co-founder at Courtroom5. She enjoys being underestimated in court and lives to catch a lawyer in a procedural error.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Cindy Koh says

    December 24, 2018 at 10:35 pm

    I have hired lawyers. But, there is no other alternative now except pro se. The case involves financial elder abuse in probate court setting. I now have a younger brother who is about to be scammed by the same siblings who treated my mother lovelessly and medical records show ended her curative care and took her home. Then they denied the special needs brother. They are using our mother’s gifts, beneficiary monies to do this. The twist also includes the fact that my mother’s lawyer committed malpractice when he removed my name as 2nd successor trustee without my mom’s written instrument. I’ve had enough. I’ve lived in this unjust environment (there’s so much more than even what I’ve shared) for 4 years. When they tried to change the irrevocable special needs trust without my signature, I realized I’ve had enough.

    Reply
  2. Debra Slone says

    March 27, 2019 at 12:36 pm

    Hi Cindy,
    Thanks for sounding in on this topic. Litigation is stressful and can quickly get real personal. Good for you for hanging in there and doing what you can with or without a lawyer.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Get Our Free 5-Day Course to Your Inbox

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

We hate spam too. We'll never share your email.

Popular Articles

  • 31 affirmative defenses 31 Affirmative Defenses And How To Assert Them
  • biggest mistakes pro se litigants make 6 Of The Biggest Mistakes Pro Se Litigants Make
  • How to Write a Motion How To Write A Motion--A Guide And Sample Motions For Pro Se Litigants

Popular Tags

access to justice affirmative defenses answer appeal bias Brian Vukadinovich case analysis Case Manager civil legal aid complaint constitution court costs court reporter Courtroom5 criminal discovery elements of a claim eviction evidence hearing how to win in court I Am Not A Lawyer judicial bias jurisdiction Lawyers We Love legal analysis legal argument Legal Bits legal research litigation litigation strategy motion for summary judgment motion to dismiss podcast pro se litigants pro se litigation Richard Zorza rules of civil procedure self-representation self represented litigant settlement Sonja Ebron summary judgment trial unbundled legal services
Follow @Courtroom5Legal
Courtroom5
Courtroom5 @Courtroom5Legal
1 hour ago
Justice is the antidote to chaos. Happy Martin Luther King Day 2021. #accesstojustice https://t.co/Bspn62idc5
View on Twitter
0
0
Courtroom5
Courtroom5 @Courtroom5Legal
4 days ago
Thanks to @WRAL for naming Courtroom5 a finalist in this year’s Voters Choice Award for most innovative local startup. #WRALVCAs https://t.co/Vde2rnxfQQ
View on Twitter
0
0
Courtroom5
Courtroom5 @Courtroom5Legal
4 days ago
Yes, still true. #accesstojustice https://t.co/D0PgmjNwDr
View on Twitter
Open Hands Legal Svc @openhandslegal
https://t.co/X4xw9pYT1w
1
2
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Courtroom5 | A Techstars Company · My Account
No legal advice offered · No substitute for a lawyer

We use cookies to ensure the best experience on our website. If you continue to browse Courtroom5, we assume this is okay for you.OK