• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Courtroom5

Be Your Own Lawyer

  • How It Works
  • Legal Tips
    • Access To Justice
    • Affirmative Defenses
    • Discovery
    • Dismissal
    • Legal Research
    • Litigation Strategy
    • Summary Judgment
  • Sign Up
  • Sign In

December 4, 2014 By Sonja Ebron 2 Comments

Judge, Heal Thy Courts For Access To Justice

The NYU Law Review has a barn-burning speech from the chief judge of the state’s appellate bench, who sees the judiciary as the leader of the access to justice revolution (pdf). Judge Lippman is a tireless advocate of legal services for the poor. His work on reforming New York’s justice system is respected throughout the country. Judge Lippman took great care in his speech to highlight innovations in other states — Texas, Connecticut, Washington, New Jersey, Delaware, Montana and California, in particular, as well as the federal courts on immigration cases — to serve the legal needs of the poor. He situated the crisis by noting that 2.3 million New York residents face legal action each year without a lawyer.

These are individuals and their families who are unable to pay for a lawyer or to access free legal assistance—people facing the loss of their homes, suffering persecution by predatory lenders, seeking to keep custody of their children or escape the abuse of a family member, or looking to protect their very subsistence. These vulnerable litigants must have greater access to legal representation if we are to achieve our constitutional mission of fostering equal justice for all, rich and poor alike.

This is a judge who gets it. He noted that New York City’s Legal Aid Society was turning away 8 of every 9 applications for help due to lack of funding. Judge Lippman then outlined several projects and proposals to increase the public’s access to lawyers that should be a model for courts nationwide:

  • secure funding for civil legal services as part of the judiciary’s budget by demonstrating the economic value of such services to the legislature ($5 returned to the state for every $1 spent on legal services to the poor);
  • require mandatory reporting, as part of the biennial attorney registration process, on the number of pro bono hours and the amount of monetary contributions to legal service providers;
  • allow attorneys licensed out of state to offer pro bono services in the state when they are in-house counsel for New York corporations, without having to seek New York registration;
  • require 50 hours of pro bono service for admission to the New York state bar (under consideration);
  • institute a “Pro Bono Scholars” program that would allow 3rd-year law students to take the bar exam in February, rather than waiting until the summer after graduating, when they dedicate the spring semester to pro bono work with a legal aid agency, law firm or corporation (under consideration);
  • allow specially trained non-lawyers called “Navigators” to assist pro se litigants in housing, consumer debt and other cases where court forms are typically used and settlement negotiations are routine (pilots in select New York cities).

Judge Lippman ended the speech on a lofty tone, calling the proposals “a revolution” where:

the judiciary is and should be at its vanguard as we incrementally move closer to a civil Gideon, where we as a society demand that people be represented when the basic necessities of life are at stake. This is what we as judges and attorneys are supposed to be doing: making equal justice a reality for everyone, regardless of his or her status in life.

These words and the policies they represent are a reminder that it is possible to reach the heights of power and still be motivated by progressive ideals. But it is helpful to also remember that access to justice is not the same as access to a lawyer. The judiciary’s authority to regulate the courts goes far beyond the funding of legal services and the discipline of attorneys. It could include changing the adversarial nature of litigation to let finders of fact (judge or jury) engage litigants directly, making litigation a more honest search for truth. It could include investments in public education to ensure regular people know their rights and the basic rules of civil procedure, encouraging self-representation. It could include simplifying procedural and appellate rules so that pro se litigants can more readily apply them. It could enforce the requirement in nearly every state that judges relax those rules for pro se litigants.  True access to justice is access to the ear of the judiciary.

—–

Pssst! Hey, you there, struggling to win your case. Isn’t it time you gave Courtroom5 a spin? We publish articles like this to help you level the playing field, but it’s sometimes too late to save your case. Stop trying to catch up. Get ahead of the game and start driving your case to the judgment you deserve. See how it works today!

More Like This:

  • If You're A Pro Se Plaintiff, This Manual Is For YouIf You're A Pro Se Plaintiff, This Manual Is For You
  • Did You Come To Appease Or To Conquer? The 5 Types Of Pro Se LitigantsDid You Come To Appease Or To Conquer? The 5 Types…
  • Best Blog Posts For Pro Se Litigants — The 2019 EditionBest Blog Posts For Pro Se Litigants — The 2019 Edition
  • Test Your Readiness For CourtTest Your Readiness For Court
  • #BlackLivesMatter = #DefundThePolice#BlackLivesMatter = #DefundThePolice
  • 31 Affirmative Defenses And How To Assert Them31 Affirmative Defenses And How To Assert Them
  • Perspectives On "A Right To Free Lawyers For Civil Litigants"Perspectives On "A Right To Free Lawyers For Civil…
  • The Skills You Need To Be Effective In CourtThe Skills You Need To Be Effective In Court

Tagged With: access to justice, Brennan Lecture, Jonathan Lippman

About Sonja Ebron

Sonja Ebron is a co-founder at Courtroom5. She enjoys being underestimated in court and lives to catch a lawyer in a procedural error.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Get Our Free 5-Day Course to Your Inbox

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

We hate spam too. We'll never share your email.

Popular Articles

  • 31 affirmative defenses 31 Affirmative Defenses And How To Assert Them
  • biggest mistakes pro se litigants make 6 Of The Biggest Mistakes Pro Se Litigants Make
  • How to Write a Motion How To Write A Motion--A Guide And Sample Motions For Pro Se Litigants

Popular Tags

access to justice affirmative defenses answer appeal bias Brian Vukadinovich case analysis Case Manager civil legal aid complaint constitution court costs court reporter Courtroom5 criminal discovery elements of a claim eviction evidence hearing how to win in court I Am Not A Lawyer judicial bias jurisdiction Lawyers We Love legal analysis legal argument Legal Bits legal research litigation litigation strategy motion for summary judgment motion to dismiss podcast pro se litigants pro se litigation Richard Zorza rules of civil procedure self-representation self represented litigant settlement Sonja Ebron summary judgment trial unbundled legal services
Follow @Courtroom5Legal
Courtroom5
Courtroom5 @Courtroom5Legal
17 hours ago
Inquiring minds in #justicetech want to know your thoughts on the legal content missing from resources for self-represented litigants. Let’s dream big! #SRLN https://t.co/ESYJSJXeqU
View on Twitter
1
4
Courtroom5
Courtroom5 @Courtroom5Legal
4 days ago
With the world, we mourn the passing of Hank Aaron - Baseball Hall of Famer, civil rights icon, philanthropist, Presidential Medal of Freedom holder, and strong advocate for #accesstojustice. https://t.co/9bleQMpZwu
View on Twitter
0
2
Courtroom5
Courtroom5 @Courtroom5Legal
6 days ago
“What just is, isn’t always Jus-tice.” Amanda Gorman, Biden/Harris Inaugural Poet, January 20, 2021 https://t.co/PGkrc4uQ49
View on Twitter
0
2
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Courtroom5 | A Techstars Company · My Account
No legal advice offered · No substitute for a lawyer

We use cookies to ensure the best experience on our website. If you continue to browse Courtroom5, we assume this is okay for you.OK