• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Courtroom5

Be Your Own Lawyer

  • Slay In Court
  • How It Works
  • Membership
  • Blog
    • Access To Justice
    • Affirmative Defenses
    • Discovery
    • Dismissal
    • Legal Research
    • Litigation Strategy
    • Summary Judgment
  • Sign In

June 17, 2014 By Debra Slone Leave a Comment

Is Access To Justice Different for Different Litigants?

Sometimes when a thing starts to fall apart, it does so gradually. No one recognizes the damage for what it is until the thing is in tatters. Or, people recognize that the thing is falling apart and are not fully aware of how to fix it. After all, it worked for a long time. In the latter case, they prop it up with first one thing and then another to see what works. Alternatively, they simply ignore it and hope that somehow it fixes itself. The current US court system is not in tatters, at least not yet, but it doesn’t work for many who use it. The growth in the number of self-represented parties tests the system’s ability to “fix itself” given an increasing number of holes, stains, rust and dust in its infrastructure. In short, for self-represented parties, the court system is dysfunctional.

In his useful and always engaging Access to Justice blog, Richard Zorza discusses the problem of fragmentation, whereby different classes of people are treated differently by US courts. Two issues of particular interest are the experiences of self represented litigants and contests between corporations and self-represented litigants. About self represented litigants, Zorza says:

“As a result of the legal profession pricing itself out of the market, there is a discussion triggered by the obvious crisis of millions of people forced to go to court in a system that assumes that everyone has a lawyer, without one.  We have made lot of progress in innovations designed to address this problem, but we are still a long way from 100% access for this group.  In order for the system to work, such litigants not only need tools, information, assistance and in certain instances a lawyer, but they also need a court management system that identifies when they need help, and gets it to them at that point, otherwise the system clogs up.  The  key point is that the litigants are not in charge, but at the mercy of the court to make the system work.”

In a section titled, “The Corporation Versus the Self-Represented Group,” he explores the power of corporations versus pro se litigants in court.

In this group, the courts should exist to act as a countervailing force to the power control and information possessed by the corporation.  The history of the foreclosure and credit debt crises shows how rarely they have played this role.  Attempts to require plaintiffs to attest to the underlying information have helped reassert the right balance, but the process has only just begun, and much remains to be done.  Here the system puts one class in near complete charge.

Are courts dysfunctional in the treatment of different kinds of litigants? Read the full article for an in-depth analysis.

More Like This:

  • 31 Affirmative Defenses And How To Assert Them31 Affirmative Defenses And How To Assert Them
  • How To Analyze A Civil Case And Craft A Litigation Strategy, Part 2How To Analyze A Civil Case And Craft A Litigation…
  • Are You Prepared For Court? Take The QuizAre You Prepared For Court? Take The Quiz
  • If You're A Pro Se Plaintiff, This Manual Is For YouIf You're A Pro Se Plaintiff, This Manual Is For You
  • The Skills You Need To Be Effective In CourtThe Skills You Need To Be Effective In Court
  • When You Understand Motions And Pleadings You Can Escape Dull Forms and Take Over Your CaseWhen You Understand Motions And Pleadings You Can…
  • Best Blog Posts For Pro Se Litigants — The 2018 EditionBest Blog Posts For Pro Se Litigants — The 2018 Edition
  • You Too Can Write An Appellate BriefYou Too Can Write An Appellate Brief

Tagged With: access to justice, Richard Zorza, self-representation

About Debra Slone

Debra Slone is a co-founder at Courtroom5. Through legal sorcery, she can find case law to support any position she wants to take in court.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Get Our Free 5-Day Course to Your Inbox

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

We hate spam too. We'll never share your email.

Popular Articles

  • 31 affirmative defenses 31 Affirmative Defenses And How To Assert Them
  • biggest mistakes pro se litigants make 6 Of The Biggest Mistakes Pro Se Litigants Make
  • oppose a motion for summary How To Oppose A Motion For Summary Judgment

Popular Tags

access to justice admissions affirmative defenses answer appeal bias Brian Vukadinovich case analysis Case Manager civil legal aid complaint constitution court reporter Courtroom5 criminal discovery elements of a claim eviction evidence hearing how to win in court judicial bias justice lawyers Lawyers We Love legal analysis legal argument Legal Bits legal case management legal research litigation litigation strategy motion for summary judgment motion to dismiss pro se litigants pro se litigation Richard Zorza rules of civil procedure self-representation self-represented self represented litigant strategy summary judgment trial unbundled legal services
Follow @Courtroom5Legal
Courtroom5
Courtroom5 @Courtroom5Legal
2 days ago
Self-Represented Litigants Lose Often. Here's Why. - Courtroom5 #accesstojustice https://t.co/1gSR2pPhtE
View on Twitter
0
0
Courtroom5
Courtroom5 @Courtroom5Legal
1 week ago
Listen... direct-to-consumer automated legal tools are the #accesstojustice solution we need. https://t.co/N6Z2ZK8CrQ
View on Twitter
0
0
Courtroom5
Courtroom5 @Courtroom5Legal
2 weeks ago
Do You Really Need Legalese In Your Pro Se Motions? - Courtroom5 #accesstojustice https://t.co/3fKpAGeKPS https://t.co/vh7laHyHOd
View on Twitter
0
0
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© 2019 Courtroom5 · My Account
No legal advice offered · No substitute for a lawyer

We use cookies to ensure the best experience on our website. If you continue to browse Courtroom5, we assume this is okay for you.OK